Right2Information

Right to Information – Master key to good governance

CNN-IBN has also started a petition against prpopsed ammendment of RTI.

Posted by rtiact2005 on August 1, 2006

CNN-IBN has also started a petition against prpopsed ammendment of RTI.

This petition is available on

http://www.ibnlive.com/features/right/letters.php#

5 Responses to “CNN-IBN has also started a petition against prpopsed ammendment of RTI.”

  1. rtiact2005 said

    Dr. Manmohan Singh,
    Prime Minister of India,
    New Delhi.

    Dear Sir,

    Sub: An appeal to save Indian democracy.

    I am appalled to learn that the Cabinet has approved an amendment to exempt file notings and cabinet papers from disclosure under the Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005. I am shocked that a progressive UPA government that fathered the Act has chosen to take this retrograde step and kill the act in its infancy.

    In the last few years, RTI has emerged as a very effective tool in the hands of a common man to check corruption, fight injustice and make governance transparent. The proposed amendments would blunt RTI’s effectiveness. This will prevent people from knowing why a particular decision was taken and who said what in that decision making process. It will prevent people from knowing why no action was taken on their applications and who the guilty officials were. In effect, the Government would end up protecting the corrupt and dishonest officials.

    It is strange that at almost the same time when your cabinet was approving such retrograde amendments, you were making a speech on how RTI could improve governance. In your speech, you stated “This Act, by promoting transparency, can be a vital instrument for cutting down corruption and ensuring that goals set for improved public service delivery can be met.”

    Would you kindly explain as to how would transparency be promoted by exempting file notings and Cabinet papers? How would service delivery improve if you protect the identity of guilty officials? One gets a feeling that your speeches are mere rhetoric and the Government does not mean what it says.

    Mr O P Kejariwal, Member Central Information Commission, recently said that “Information minus the file notings amount to taking the life out of the RTI Act”.

    The Act is just 10 months old. The Government should have given at least a few years before attempting to amend it. Nine state governments have RTI Acts for the last seven years or more. File notings were being given under those Acts. No bureaucrat in any of these states felt threatened the way bureaucrats working directly under you seem to be feeling.

    It was hoped that your government would strengthen the Act and not take the life out of it, within one year of its coming into existence.

    I therefore demand that the Right to Information Act, 2005 not be tampered with. Let the government of India not be held hostage by its Babus! I will not vote for the sitting MP if he/she did not vote against the amendment Bill in Parliament.

    Sincerely,

  2. rtiact2005 said

    The President of India,
    New Delhi.

    Dear Sir,

    Sub: An appeal to save Indian democracy.

    I am appalled to learn that the Cabinet has approved an amendment to exempt file notings and cabinet papers from disclosure under the Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005.

    In the last few years, RTI has emerged as a very effective tool in the hands of a common man to check corruption, fight injustice and make governance transparent. The proposed amendments would blunt RTI’s effectiveness. This will prevent people from knowing why a particular decision was taken and who said what in that decision making process. It will prevent people from knowing why no action was taken on their applications and who the guilty officials were. In effect, the Government would end up protecting the corrupt and dishonest officials.

    It is strange that at almost the same time when the cabinet was approving such retrograde amendments, the Prime Minister was making a speech on how RTI could improve governance. He stated “This Act, by promoting transparency, can be a vital instrument for cutting down corruption and ensuring that goals set for improved public service delivery can be met.”

    One wonders how would transparency be promoted by exempting file notings and Cabinet papers? How would service delivery improve if you protect the identity of guilty officials?

    Mr O P Kejariwal, Member Central Information Commission, recently said that “Information minus the file notings amount to taking the life out of the RTI Act”.

    The Act is just 10 months old. The Government should have given at least a few years before attempting to amend it. Nine state governments have RTI Acts for the last seven years or more. File notings were being given under those Acts. No bureaucrat in any of these states felt threatened the way bureaucrats working in the Central Government seem to be feeling.

    I request you not to sign the amendment bill, if it is ever sent to you. You may decide either to just sit on it indefinitely or to return it to the Government.

    Sincerely,

  3. rtiact2005 said

    Mrs Sonia Gandhi,
    New Delhi.

    Dear Madam,

    Sub: An appeal to save Indian democracy.

    I am appalled to learn that the Cabinet has approved an amendment to exempt file notings and cabinet papers from disclosure under the Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005. I am shocked that a progressive UPA government that fathered the Act has chosen to take this retrograde step and kill the act in its infancy.

    In the last few years, RTI has emerged as a very effective tool in the hands of a common man to check corruption, fight injustice and make governance transparent. The proposed amendments would blunt RTI’s effectiveness. This will prevent people from knowing why a particular decision was taken and who said what in that decision making process. It will prevent people from knowing why no action was taken on their applications and who the guilty officials were. In effect, the Government would end up protecting the corrupt and dishonest officials.

    It is strange that at almost the same time when the cabinet was approving such retrograde amendments, the Prime Minister was making a speech on how RTI could improve governance. He stated “This Act, by promoting transparency, can be a vital instrument for cutting down corruption and ensuring that goals set for improved public service delivery can be met.”

    One wonders how would transparency be promoted by exempting file notings and Cabinet papers? How would service delivery improve if you protect the identity of guilty officials? One gets a feeling that PM’s speeches are mere rhetoric and the Government does not mean what it says.

    Mr O P Kejariwal, Member Central Information Commission, recently said that “Information minus the file notings amount to taking the life out of the RTI Act”.

    The Act is just 10 months old. The Government should have given at least a few years before attempting to amend it. Nine state governments have RTI Acts for the last seven years or more. File notings were being given under those Acts. No bureaucrat in any of these states felt threatened the way bureaucrats working in the Central Government seem to be feeling.

    Such an excellent Act came in existence only due to your personal intervention. We hope you would again intervene and prevent your own Government from killing it.

    I have decided that I will not vote for my sitting MP if he/she did not vote against the amendment bill in the Parliament.

    Sincerely,

  4. rtiact2005 said

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    Sub: An appeal to save Indian democracy.

    I am appalled to learn that the Cabinet has approved an amendment to exempt file notings and cabinet papers from disclosure under the Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005.

    In the last few years, RTI has emerged as a very effective tool in the hands of a common man to check corruption, fight injustice and make governance transparent. The proposed amendments would blunt RTI’s effectiveness. This will prevent people from knowing why a particular decision was taken and who said what in that decision making process. It will prevent people from knowing why no action was taken on their applications and who the guilty officials were. In effect, the Government would end up protecting the corrupt and dishonest officials.

    Mr O P Kejariwal, Member Central Information Commission, recently said that “Information minus the file notings amount to taking the life out of the RTI Act”.

    The Act is just 10 months old. The Government should have given at least a few years before attempting to amend it. Nine state governments have RTI Acts for the last seven years or more. File notings were being given under those Acts. No bureaucrat in any of these states felt threatened the way bureaucrats working in the Central Government seem to be feeling.

    I request you to make every effort to save this right from being mutilated. I have decided that I will not vote for my sitting MP if he/she did not vote against the amendment bill in the Parliament.

    Sincerely,

  5. Kishor Magdum said

    This ammendment is unwarranted as impact of current RTI act need to be observed first for at least 3 years before doing any changes.

    I am fully supporting reknown social worker Mr.Anna Hazare who is on indefinite fast against this ammendement.

    The Government should act immediately & take positive steps in this regard.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: